| Author |
Message |
| Registered: October 3, 2007 |  Posts: 65 |
| | Posted: | | | |  Remember to post why you have voted the way you have...and have fun  - Rimmer'  | | | Look, I'm not much good at big speeches, and I know I haven't always been an easy guy to get on with, and I know, that given the choice, I wouldn't have chosen you as friends, but I just want to say, that over the years, I have come to regard you as people I met.
RED DWARF - Rimmer’s farewell speech |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,480 |
| | Posted: | | | | Have to go with Scorcese's version.
Robert De Niro plays a great nut job.
Jessica Lange is just...great.
Love Gregory Peck and Robert Mitchum though.
Tough call. | | | ...James
"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 17,330 |
| | Posted: | | | | Really enjoyed the remake... but ashamed to say I never seen the original.  | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | I went for original cos Robert Mitchum is just so much creepier than Robert de Niro - and he didn't have to bite anyone's cheek off! |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 262 |
| | Posted: | | | | Voted for the remake for the simple reason that I am a De Niro nut and therefore anything he is in I will vote for ('cept maybe Rocky and Bullwinkle). The original is great as well. | | | | DVD Profiler user since October 1, 2004 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 4,596 |
| | Posted: | | | | Voted for the original. Loved Mitchum and Mr. Peck. In the remake, Nolte just didn't cut it for me and I'm not a big fan of Julliette Lewis. De Niro did a great job though. | | | | My WebGenDVD online Collection |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Posts: 1,982 |
| | Posted: | | | | The first round and I already have to go with the remake. Scorcese is one of my favorite director and as usual DeNiro is great in it. But I can say nothing about the original since I didn't view it. I almost buy it when the 2 was in the same pack, but I miss it and since this time I never think about that again. Now that you mention it, I will probably place an order. |
|
| Registered: April 17, 2007 |  Posts: 771 |
| | Posted: | | | | I voted for the original because Mitchum is a bit creepier than De Niro and Peck is way better than Nolte, but its one of the best remakes I have seen. | | |  |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting hallo-marvin: Quote:
I voted for the original because Mitchum is a bit creepier than De Niro and Peck is way better than Nolte, but its one of the best remakes I have seen. I prefer the original. Polly Bergen! But the remake is one of the best remakes, ever... | | | If it wasn't for bad taste, I wouldn't have no taste at all.
Cliff |
|
| Registered: June 21, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,621 |
| | Posted: | | | | Haven't seen the original in so long that I can't place a fair vote.
I do love (and own) the remake. |
|
 | JonM | | Registered 28 Dec 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 343 |
| | Posted: | | | | Both are great, but I give the edge to the original. Believe me, if the only version was the later, then it would be a masterpiece to me. But:
Robert Mitchum was better than De Niro in this case. A role for a movie star as big as they can get.
Gregory Peck is always better than Nick Nolte. This is Atticus, for goodnes sake!
I could root for the family. Scorcese's clan were seriously dysfunctional. I know that's the point, but I still like the originals basic light v dark approach.
Finally, wasn't Spielberg originally down to direct? I've always felt that Scorcese tried to mimic his style a little, which he has no need to do. Maybe production was quite far along and it was too late to make it truly his own? | | | Jon
"When Mister Safety Catch Is Not On, Mister Crossbow Is Not Your Friend."
 |
|
| Registered: May 29, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,475 |
| | Posted: | | | | The original edges out the remake for me. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 742 |
| | Posted: | | | | I, too, haven't seen the original version, so this is a very one-sided call, based solely on the excellence of the remake.
Robert DeNiro is awesome in his portrayal of the ex-con bent on revenge, Nolte gives a solid performance as someone forced to deal with a situation he can't cope with, Jessica Lange is ... nice, and Juliette Lewis is the perfect cast for the role of a supposedly innocent girl willing to explore the darker side of life.
I did intend to buy the two when released together as a box set, but then went for a really good deal on the two disc special edition of the remake and don't feel like double dipping to own the original. | | | | Lutz |
|
| Registered: April 7, 2007 | | Posts: 228 |
| | Posted: | | | | both a really good movies but im going with scorsese's version... de niro is such a creep in it... | | | That's the thing about racism, though, most of it is covert.
"Freedom without Socialism is privilege and injustice and Socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality."Bakunin
“It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.”Churchill
Fire Next Time: http://www.valdosta.edu/~cawalker/baldwin.htm
Some people think football [and soccer] is a matter of life and death.... I can assure them it is much more serious than that. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 4,623 |
| | Posted: | | | | This is one of the few remakes that doesn't suck when compared to the original (IMHO), but I still have to go with the original. As good as De Niro is, I still think Mitchum is creepier. | | | My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,394 |
| | Posted: | | | | I own both on DVD but have only ever watched the original, so I can't honestly vote, though I'm not sure how/if the remake could be much better. I have a favor to ask, Rimmer. In the future, I wish you'd resize your page so that it fits the screen without me having to scroll right and left. At home I have a widescreen monitor, but here at work I only have a standard screen. At 1024x768, your uploads are too wide for viewing without horizontal scrolling. So for this thread (and the one about Black Sheep, for example) it's a nuisance to have to scroll left & right - especially to read the text. So, would it be too much to ask to limit yourself to something that would fit on a 1024x768 screen? (I suppose there are some out there that still use a 640-wide screen but I'd guess not that many.) TIA  | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole)
Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges.
DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
|