Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3  Previous   Next
Multiple seasons/series in a set
Author Message
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorVoltaire53
Missed again!
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 2,293
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Without getting too bogged down in the differing definitions of seasons and series from either side of the Pond, I was just wondering if there was any agreement (!) on, when they clash, whether disc level or season level profiles had priority.

To explain, if a set contains "The Complete Series" of 3 seasons (say, spread over 6 discs, 2 for each season) the rules say we can/should treat the parent profile as a boxset with each of the seasons as a child profile.

This is easy enough with something like Buffy when the seasons are sold separately and then later sold as a Complete set as the season sets can just be set as children of the complete Set parent.

However IF the seasons are not available separately and someone has (quite reasonably) submitted disc level profiles for all 6 discs then the only way to get SEASON level profiles is to overwrite those profiles.
ie. Season 1 submitted under the first disc's Disc ID (with disc info for discs 1 and 2 in the profile), Season 2 submitted under the 3rd disc's Disc ID (with disc info for discs 3 and 4 in the profile) etc.

BTW this is more common in the UK because often, even when previously released seasons are packaged together in a Complete "big box", the EAN is removed and a 'Not to be sold separately' slogan put in its place.

Basically, has there ever been an agreement on whether doing this at the season level would take 'priority' over the (optional) disc level profiles, or is it a case of who gets there first, as with multiple titles with the same EAN/UPC, so it just has to be kept local?

Thanks in advance for any thoughts.
It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAddicted2DVD
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 17,330
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I don't know about how others view this... but in my opinion. If the disc level profiles are already there I would not change it. In my eyes first in takes priority.
Pete
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorBad Father
Registered: July 23, 2001
Registered: March 13, 2007
Posts: 4,596
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I agree with Pete. First come, first served.
My WebGenDVD online Collection
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,722
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
I'd support overwriting them with season profiles - that's what the rules tell us to do with these sets. Each series gets his own child profile. The rules go on to say that "Individual profiles for each disc may be submitted if desired, but this is not required." So first we're told, without further conditions, how to deal with these multi-season sets, and then there is the option to create (grand)child profiles for those that want to. That, to me, certainly indicates a definite difference in priority to keep us from having to fall back on the dreaded "first one in wins" principle.
 Last edited: by T!M
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAddicted2DVD
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 17,330
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Actually Tim... there is nothing definite in that notation. It is left as open as disc level profiles are for TV Series in the rules.

Rules Quote:
Quote:
Note: In rare cases where multiple Complete TV Series are packaged together, the Box-set rules can be applied, treating each series like a single film - applying the above rules for it’s individual profile.


There is nothing there saying that you have to. Just that you CAN apply the boxset rules. So disc level profiles is just as correct as using seasons as children.
Pete
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAddicted2DVD
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 17,330
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting T!M:
Quote:
I'd support overwriting them with season profiles - that's what the rules tell us to do with these sets. Each series gets his own child profile. The rules go on to say that "Individual profiles for each disc may be submitted if desired, but this is not required." So first we're told, without further conditions, how to deal with these multi-season sets, and then there is the option to create (grand)child profiles for those that want to. That, to me, certainly indicates a definite difference in priority to keep us from having to fall back on the dreaded "first one in wins" principle.


As I just stated. The season child profiles for boxset rules is just the same. "Can be submitted" is no different then "submit if desired, but this is not required". It is 2 different ways of saying the same thing.
Pete
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorhal9g
Who is John Galt?
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 6,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
The key to the OP is that he states that the "seasons are not available separately".

If they are not available separately, then we should not be profiling the season itself, at all.

The Child profiles should remain untouched.
Hal
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,722
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
There is nothing there saying that you have to. Just that you CAN apply the boxset rules. So disc level profiles is just as correct as using seasons as children.

We discussed that over and over again - I thought that by now we all agreed we read that as "SHOULD apply the box set rules". Either way, I feel season level profiles should prevail. Certainly, anything is better than the "first one in wins"-principle.
 Last edited: by T!M
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAddicted2DVD
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 17,330
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Why would we agree on that? Can don't mean it should be done. Can means the option is there.... no more and no less then that.

I for one will always go by what is actual in the rules. Not what I (or anyone other then Ken or Gerri) want them to say.
Pete
 Last edited: by Addicted2DVD
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,722
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
Can means the option is there.... no more and no less then that.

"Can" means trouble every single time, as countless recurring forum topics clearly show... 
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorBad Father
Registered: July 23, 2001
Registered: March 13, 2007
Posts: 4,596
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I certainly don't recall an "over and over again discussion" agreeing to "SHOULD apply the box set rules". There is NO way I would personally have agreed to that.
My WebGenDVD online Collection
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,722
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
I for one will always go by what is actual in the rules. Not what I (or anyone other then Ken or Gerri) want them to say.

Me too. They say I can use season child profiles for these, "treating each series like a single film". So that's what I do.
 Last edited: by T!M
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorhal9g
Who is John Galt?
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 6,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting T!M:
Quote:
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
There is nothing there saying that you have to. Just that you CAN apply the boxset rules. So disc level profiles is just as correct as using seasons as children.

We discussed that over and over again - I thought that by now we all agreed we read that as "SHOULD apply the box set rules". Either way, I feel season level profiles should prevail. Certainly, anything is better than the "first one in wins"-principle.


Truth is, in practice, this is what is done in most cases. 

However, if a TV show is released with multiple seasons included and they have never been released individually, and they don't have their own UPC, why would you want to profile the season using the Disc ID of the first disc which for the most part is an empty profile, in lieu of a fully populated profile of the first child profile?

That just doesn't make any sense to me.
Hal
 Last edited: by hal9g
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAddicted2DVD
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 17,330
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting T!M:
Quote:
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
I for one will always go by what is actual in the rules. Not what I (or anyone other then Ken or Gerri) want them to say.

Me too. They say I can use season child profiles for these sets, "treating each series like a single film". So that's what I do.


And it also says it can be disc level profiles. So that is what I will always do. And if someone updates a disc level to make it a season profile I can and will vote no to that info since it will be replacing valid info allowed per the rules.
Pete
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,722
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
why would you want to profile the season using the Disc ID of the first disc which for the most part is an empty profile, in lieu of a fully populated profile of the first child profile?

Why would you think it would be empty? That would not even be allowed by the rules. For instance: "In either case, the cast and crew are to be entered into the parent profile using appropriate episode dividers." So they'd be full season profiles, with absolutely nothing missing.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,722
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
And if someone updates a disc level to make it a season profile I can and will vote no to that info since it will be replacing valid info allowed per the rules.

So will I. These sets in my collection are all set up with season child profiles, and I will vote against anyone trying to overwrite them with "disc 1" profiles - for the exact same reason.
 Last edited: by T!M
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3  Previous   Next