Make sure that the EAN/UPC of the scan is identical with the one of the profile.

Could you upload an example scan to imageshack.us or another image dump and link them here so that we could take a look at the scans?

Why do users come  and complain and start new threads for the same thread that was started by someone else a week ago?

To see the status and reasons for decline, visit the My Profiler->Contributions link above.  Although we're not able to provide a detailed reason every time, in this case the reason is listed.

Also be sure you have read the rules relative to cover images, and follow those rules, and pay attention to the above two comments.

All of us would like to see reasons for declines but sometimes it may not be practical, please keep in mind that the screeners , and I don't think there are a lot of them because they cost Invelos money, go through thousands and thousands of titles per month. The last time anything was said specifically in this regard, they were checking 30,000 titles per month on average. It'sjust not possible or realistic to expect a reason for each and every decline.

I can't say that I have seen any of your Contributions so I have no idea what they look like. Do you make a Contribution and simply walk away from it, as many users do and then complain, or do you actually check to see what fellow users who might vote on your Contribution have to say about them, we are required to leave a reason when we vote No, such as watermarked image, image does not conform to Rules for size relative to an existing image, images are not an improvement existing image and so forth. The reasons for data are endless.

SKip

I just resubmitted and the latest submission looks the same?

Is there somewhere you can see what is included in the submission?

Anyways, here is the cover scans (let me know if something is wrong with them)

For DVD: 7350021961327 (Swedish Locality)

The strange thing is I did include comments and cover scans and such...

Comments can be viewed here:


New listing entries can be viewed here:


And "view contribution" still looks like this:


// MickeM

After checking the online database for this specific EAN a third reason for the decline is becoming obvious:
You are contributing for a complete new profile, which isn't in the database yet.
The basic information needed in such a case is the title of the DVD and again the sources you used.
Best would be to upload all your data concerning this profile and state that this is a new profile in the contribution notes.

Just as an example, here are the contribution notes I submitted for a new contribution some time ago. The contribution was approved.

"New contribution: travel DVD. Almost all data from disc. Cast and Crew Credits from the film's opening and end credits. Running time, video format and audio track verified using PowerDVD. Region and layer info verified using DVDInfoPro. Release date and SRP from www.amazon.de."

Hope you'll be more successful next time around. Happy contributing!

Ahh... I never checked that actually I bought years and years ago so I just assumed it was in the database but without scans...

Thanks everyone for the help.

// Michael Medin

Quoting Woola:

Quote:

So now the first thing for you to do is read the rules and then contribute the data appropriately.

I should say that the first thing for mickem to do is to complete the profile in the way he wants for his own database. If his local preferences match with the rules, he may contribute, if not, it's up to him to build two profiles, one for contribution per the rules, and one correct.

It's not a problem not to contribute, as Ken wrote himself when he noticed that never things had been better than now about the number and quality of contributors.