Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 ...15  Previous   Next
Hiroshi Kan Ikeuchi common name
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorKluge
Registered: August 4, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Italy Posts: 2,441
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Puppeteer Hiroshi Kan Ikeuchi

Hiroshi "Kan" Ikeuchi" is credited in 17 titles (31 profiles) but only variants of
Aliens VS Predator 2
Monkey Bone

"Hiroshi Kan Ikeuchi" is credited in 6 titles (18 profiles):
Earth Vs. the Spider
Seed of Chucky (Faggot and Addicted2DVD)
Nutty Professor II: The Klumps
Spider-Man 2
Spinnen des Todes: Creature Feature

And there aren't ambiguous credits.
The bolded are verified.
So the common name should be Hiroshi Kan Ikeuchi, or am I wrong?
Updated List of Accepted Birth Years
 Last edited: by Kluge
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Kluge:

The problem is that the CLT gives a completely different answer:

Kan = 6/18 "Kan" = 17/31

So Kan per the CLT is NOT the Commonly credited Name.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorBerak
Bibamus morieundum est!
Registered: May 10, 2007
Norway Posts: 1,059
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Agree with Skip here.

The CLT is what it is...

Eat it and move on.... 
Berak

It's better to burn out than to fade away!
True love conquers all!
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorKluge
Registered: August 4, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Italy Posts: 2,441
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Woola:
Quote:
Kluge:

The problem is that the CLT gives a completely different answer:

Kan = 6/18 "Kan" = 17/31

So Kan per the CLT is NOT the Commonly credited Name.

Skip


Sorry Skip, but if we reed the CLT results we can clearly see that the common name is Kan, because it appear in 5 title, while "kan" is only in 2 title...
I'm confused.
Updated List of Accepted Birth Years
 Last edited: by Kluge
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorBerak
Bibamus morieundum est!
Registered: May 10, 2007
Norway Posts: 1,059
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
How hard can this be Kluge?

Hiroshi Kan Ikeuchi  =  6/18
Hiroshi "Kan" Ikeuchi  =  17/31

Until you can effectivley change the "Kan"'s to the Kan's you will not be able to use Kan as common name... 

Is that so hard to understand?!   
Berak

It's better to burn out than to fade away!
True love conquers all!
 Last edited: by Berak
Faggot
Registered: September 21, 2009
Posts: 6
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
He's credited without any quotes in Seed of Chucky as per the CLT results.

Don't know what the other guys are on about, your maths seems ok to me Kluge as long as the other credits come back right.

PS. It might be helpful to know that Spinnen des Todes is the German title for the 2001 TV movie Earth vs. the Spider if anyone has it under that title instead.
 Last edited: by Faggot
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Kluge:
Quote:
Quoting Woola:
Quote:
Kluge:

The problem is that the CLT gives a completely different answer:

Kan = 6/18 "Kan" = 17/31

So Kan per the CLT is NOT the Commonly credited Name.

Skip


Sorry Skip, but if we reed the CLT results we can clearly see that the common name is Kan, because it appear in 4 title, while "kan" is only in 2 title...
I'm confused.

Kluge:

I don't have any idea where you are getting your results or what you are interpreting. The data is what it is. Based onwhat I see in the results, which are the same as those reported by both Berak and The mad Marttian, clearly "kab" IS the most Commonly credited name. You are doing some fairly strange interpreting, which I can only guess at, to create yor results, but they are not the results that are generated by the CLT itself.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorArdos
Registered: July 31, 2008
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 2,506
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
It's down to the poorly entered data. Once you filter them down to what they should be entered as "Kan" only has two distinct titles - AvP: Requiem & Monkeybone, all others are only variants of those two titles. On the other hand Kan has 4 titles, again once you filter out those that SHOULD be linked together.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Except that calls for ASSUMPTIONS, which may or may NOT be correct, Forget. As has been noted repeatedly there is no guarantee that credit listings are the same across Regions/Localities or Version....in fact the opposite has been demonstrated. The ONLY way to verify that one way or the other is for EVERY title in which he is credited to be audited and verified, ONLY then can we generate a CORRECT CLT. We cannot do so by making global changes based upon an assumption which may well prove to be incorrect.. Right now the CLT results say than "Kan" IS the most Common Name, Period.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorArdos
Registered: July 31, 2008
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 2,506
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
It calls for no assumptions at all & variations of credited names don't factor into the equation AT ALL. The ONLY thing that factors in to it here is that they haven't been entered correctly (typically original title and/or formatting per the rules). If they had been the numbers would be the correct amount.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
You can't know that, Forget, you can make assumptions, but unless you OWN every possible title involved, YOU cannot categorically state that something is wrong beyond what you own. The assumption MAY be correct, but we know for an absolute FACT that your assumption can easily be INCORRECT as well. The ONLY way to determine that is for each and every version to be audited and verified, not assumed, ACTUALLY verified.

Unlike some users I am not willing to make assumptions about titles that have many possible iterations and I only own ONE or maybe TWO of. That data only applies to what I own. This is going to continue tyo be a controversy as long as users selectively pick and choose the words that ken has stated so that they can  twist them to their own advantage.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
 Last edited: by Winston Smith
Faggot
Registered: September 21, 2009
Posts: 6
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
What? We can't assume that Alien vs Predator 2 and AVP 2 or that Nutty Professor - The Klumps and Nutty Professor: The Klumps are the same films? 
 Last edited: by Faggot
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTaro
Registered: February 23, 2009
Reputation: High Rating
Belgium Posts: 1,580
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Going by CLT as well as external sources (http://movie-fan.jp/filmography/00156860.html), I think his name should be entered as:
First: Hiroshi
Middle: "Kan" (Kan is a pseudonym)
Last: Ikeuchi
That's my guess, at least
Blu-ray collection
DVD collection
My Games
My Trophies
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Faggot:

What a strange name. We have proven that Credit lists are NOT necessarily the same across Versions, Region or Localities that a film may be released in . For example, one of the most famous these is two separate releases of Con Air which in one has Dave Chapelle credited and the other one has David Chapelle.

As has been stated numerous, times Faggot, since you are new to this party. This has been PROVEN. In fact over a year ago I began an experiment, based on what seemed a reasonable assumption, in fact the SAME assumption that this discussion is centered on.  That there would be ONE set of Credit for any given film, it seemed reasonable. I called on the Community to help with this experiment by verifying their own credits against the assumption, it took less than for that premise to beproven invalid, I repeat less than ONE WEEK. We don't know how often this happens, I suspect far more often than we might think, but that it happens at all invalidates any such assumed contributions.

Alos the Rukles do not tell us to make the kind of adjustments that Kluge is trying to make or that Forget is supporting, they simply say to use the CLT results, which he has not done. If adjustments need to be made in the future as other copies are properly verified, then that can easily be done, but no assumptions. When you assume something you make an Ass of U and Me.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Taro:
Quote:
Going by CLT as well as external sources (http://movie-fan.jp/filmography/00156860.html), I think his name should be entered as:
First: Hiroshi
Middle: "Kan" (Kan is a pseudonym)
Last: Ikeuchi
That's my guess, at least

Now you are making up Rules Taro, there is no provision for external sources to supplement the CLT.

The CLT results are what they are. PERIOD.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
 Last edited: by Winston Smith
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorpdf256
PC, iOS and Android
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 810
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Woola:
Quote:
...

Alos the Rukles do not tell us to make the kind of adjustments that Kluge is trying to make or that Forget is supporting, they simply say to use the CLT results, which he has not done. If adjustments need to be made in the future as other copies are properly verified, then that can easily be done, but no assumptions. When you assume something you make an Ass of U and Me.

Skip

Skip/DP/Jubal/Woola,

You are missing what Kluge is saying; The "17" Titles are just "2", 4 ways to write "Monkeybone" and 13 ways to write "Aliens VS Predator 2". This leads to the other entry which was 6 titles.

pdf
Paul Francis
San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 ...15  Previous   Next