The only reason I can see for NOT using the slip cover is if that one is too shiny to make a proper scan of. But in those cases the same would apply to the parent profile.

Everything that shares the same package should also share the same cover images.

Quoting dee1959jay:

Quote:
The only reason I can see for NOT using the slip cover is if that one is too shiny to make a proper scan of. But in those cases the same would apply to the parent profile.

Everything that shares the same package should also share the same cover images.

Agreed.

Let not yourheart be troubled. That said, Taro, they are not voting against the scans but against the data and to that degree they are correct.It DOES mean that what you should do is edit the scans to remove the BD banner for the Children as the program will add it in.

Skip

Rick:

The children should nothave the Slip cover checked, so the banner should be removed because the Program will add it. This of course does not apply to the parent. No different from anyother Boxset or TV Series. Magnum PI for example the Parent is a Slip Case and the children are Thin Paks, or if it's the Digipak Season, the Parent should have the Slip Cover Checked but the children should not.

The No votes are only about the data, not about his images, and in that regard they are correct. Hopefully Taro will make the necessary modification.

Skip

This is something that was never an issue until BD, deejay. But that is essentially what the Rules describe.

Example once again, Magnum PI with Thinpaks, those are checked are Thinpaks and of course the children get the Thinpak cover. Doing at as you describe is the inconsistency. The case gets appropriately described relative to the CHILDREN, which in this case means an HD case, this also means that the image must be modified to remove the Banner as the program will add it back in.

You are wanting totreat it differently because of something that has come about, that is new to the system. I am describing consistency with the Rules, those who voted NO on the basis of the Rules are correct to the data.

Skip

We are talking abiout the Rules as they exist today, deejay. And that is the Rules.

I also this as largely an argument for arguments sake, that is of absolutely no significance. So I am done with it.

Skip

I absolutely wouldn't mind pulling the submissions and adapting one final time but seriously, I need a clear answer here.

If I understand correctly, some people are OK with the scans but not with the fact I checked slipcover. If I leave the slip cover checked off, you get a double blu-ray banner.

Another solution suggested by Skip among others is to then crop off the blu-ray banner of the slip cover, but again, I think altering a slipcover in such a way is also against the rules.

The rules I think apply are, summarized:
- If there is a slip cover, use the slip cover
- If it's a box set, there are two variants:
  * each disc has it's own case: use the cover scans of each disc's individual case
  * all discs are packed together in one keep case: use the same cover (and cover type) as the parent (in this occurrence: slip cover scan and case type)

At least, that's how I understood it. If someone can shed some clear light on where I am wrong and why it needs to be adapted, that would be very helpful since I feel we've been turning in circles around these submissions for quite some time now and no matter how I submit it, there's always a % of voters that is unhappy with the option taken.

To answer lyonsden5, what I have adapted in the submissions is this:
- changed cover scan from normal cover to a scan of the slip cover
- checked the box for slip cover in the cover type section
All the rest of the data I left unchanged. Apparently, the no-voters disagree with me checking the slip cover box in the cover type section

Quoting Woola:

Quote:
We are talking abiout the Rules as they exist today, deejay. And that is the Rules.
Skip

As I already asked you in an earlier post: show me WHERE then.