Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 Previous Next
|
When 1.85 is really 1.78 |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: May 8, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,945 |
| Posted: | | | | I hate it when a film that is supposed to be 1:2.35 is broadcasted, released or w/e in 1:1.78. It is a crime against the director They are just doing it so that the screen is fully filled with picture material Donnie | | | www.tvmaze.com |
| Registered: July 22, 2007 | Posts: 348 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DarklyNoon: Quote: I hate it when a film that is supposed to be 1:2.35 is broadcasted, released or w/e in 1:1.78.
It is a crime against the director
They are just doing it so that the screen is fully filled with picture material Donnie BTW is it 2.35:1 and 1.78:1. (H:V) In any event, there are still way too many people who do not like black bars, either on the top/bottom or left/right. Hence the broadcasting of 2.35:1 movies being pan-n-scanned to fill the 16:9 screen. If it were released on Blu-ray that way I'd return it as defective. I've personally not run across a Blu-ray that is formatted wrong. Even the DVDs that I've purchased haven't done that. Guess I've been lucky. The U.S. broadcast networks are horrible for taking 2.35:1 movies and filling the screen. I do not watch movies on broadcast TV. I hate the commercial interruptions, the network bugs and snipes, etc. If I want to see it, I have it on Blu-ray/DVD. | | | Mr Video Productions If it isn't Unix, it isn't an OS :-) |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 951 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting MrVideo: Quote: I've personally not run across a Blu-ray that is formatted wrong. Even the DVDs that I've purchased haven't done that. Guess I've been lucky. You need to check out the Canada Blu-ray releases from Alliance. | | | Are you local? This is a local shop the strangers you would bring would not understand us, our customs, our local ways. |
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,550 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting MrVideo: Quote: I've personally not run across a Blu-ray that is formatted wrong. Even the DVDs that I've purchased haven't done that. Guess I've been lucky. One of the more interesting ones was Traitor. The Blu-ray was released with the original 2.40 aspect ratio while the DVD was 1.78... So odd. |
| Registered: July 22, 2007 | Posts: 348 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Tracer: Quote: You need to check out the Canada Blu-ray releases from Alliance. Guess I'll never buy anything from them. If no one else bought those discs, maybe they might get the idea as to why their releases aren't selling very well. More so if people would send them e-mail complaining about the pan-n-scan 16:9 releases. | | | Mr Video Productions If it isn't Unix, it isn't an OS :-) |
| Registered: July 22, 2007 | Posts: 348 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMovieman: Quote: One of the more interesting ones was Traitor. The Blu-ray was released with the original 2.40 aspect ratio while the DVD was 1.78... So odd. Separate releases, or a combo release? If the DVD came out first, it was probably mastered onto NTSC, which meant for the Blu-ray release they had to go back and remaster for HD and knowing that buyers wouldn't like a 16:9 full screen version, did it right. If they had a NTSC master around and had already authored a DVD version, redoing it for a Blu-ray combo release just wasn't worth the expense. Personally, for me, putting in a DVD version is a total waste of time, money and materials. | | | Mr Video Productions If it isn't Unix, it isn't an OS :-) |
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,550 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting MrVideo: Quote: Quoting TheMovieman:
Quote: One of the more interesting ones was Traitor. The Blu-ray was released with the original 2.40 aspect ratio while the DVD was 1.78... So odd.
Separate releases, or a combo release?
If the DVD came out first, it was probably mastered onto NTSC, which meant for the Blu-ray release they had to go back and remaster for HD and knowing that buyers wouldn't like a 16:9 full screen version, did it right.
If they had a NTSC master around and had already authored a DVD version, redoing it for a Blu-ray combo release just wasn't worth the expense.
Personally, for me, putting in a DVD version is a total waste of time, money and materials. No, separate (but on the same day). | | | Last edited: by The Movieman |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 Previous Next
|
|