Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2  Previous Next
|
|
Company suffixes in Group Dividers |
|
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,934 |
| | Posted: | | | | This conversation is all well and good, but Ken never made a ruling on the content of the dividers yet, has he?
Charlie |
| | Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 6,018 |
| | Posted: | | | | Correct, Charlie. Hence the last sentence in my original post.
The poll shows that opinions are divided on the issue, so we're not going to sort this by ourselves. We need the Great Zombie to weigh in on the matter and tell us one way or the other. |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Katatonia: Quote:
Quoting Pantheon:
Quote:
Take the above rules into consideration with the following from the Studios section of the rules: "Omit company suffixes such as LLC, Ltd., Inc."
Agreed, and if we're to "enter what is on screen exactly" as some propose, that rule would also have to be changed.
I would vote "No" here. I simply don't care about Inc., Ltd., etc. But I would abide by any official decision in the matter. I disagree with you, Kat, they are two totally different issues, though I have decided that suffixes are also good in the studios, but the two are not related in any way. this would be like trying to claim that the prohibition against Associations or Guild Afiiliation would have to be revisited as well, they are suffixes too....wrong.  | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 20,111 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Prof. Kingsfield: Quote:
I disagree with you, Kat, they are two totally different issues, though I have decided that suffixes are also good in the studios, but the two are not related in any way. this would be like trying to claim that the prohibition against Associations or Guild Afiiliation would have to be revisited as well, they are suffixes too....wrong. Disagree all you want, it was merely my personal opinion on the matter. | | | | Corey |
| | Registered: March 10, 2007 | | Posts: 4,282 |
| | Posted: | | | | I don't see enough driving reason for completeness in this field to warrant deviation from the existing studio rule. Therefore, leave out the suffixes here as well. I'll queue this up for inclusion in the next rules update. | | | | Invelos Software, Inc. Representative |
|   | T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,736 |
| | Posted: | | | | Thanks for chiming in! |
| | Registered: March 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,018 |
| | Posted: | | | | Many thanks, Ken! Now we all know what to contribute. |
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 Previous Next
|
|
|