|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 Previous Next
|
Using group dividers to separate technical crews from different companies |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,934 |
| Posted: | | | | And another thing.
If this is the technical meaning of the rule, then we, as profilers, are definitely going to express this in the contribution notes. I had a contribution declined. I included the "Washington DC Crew" 3 for 2 against. One of the no comments was "doesn't 'Washington DC' crew technically signify 2nd unit?". The answer to that is NO, but I did not reiterate that and got declined.
I have had a few others that were accepted, without issue. No consistency with the screeners.
There needs to ba a formal statement, and rule addendum to say yes or no...
Charlie |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting CharlieM: Quote: Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:
Quote: Marnix:
Simple question
Does it say London Unit---if it does do NOT enter the data for Contribution
Does it say London or London Crew---Fine, enter the data.
I don't necessarily agree with this. I think we need to look at what the "Unit" is doing.
Whereas a "Second Unit" typically is filming supporting shots (background, crowds, etc), a crew labeled as "(choose your location) Unit", may very well be more of a location crew. We cannot trust how film makers label there sections.
There was an interesting thought in the previous discussion as to whether or not the "unit" has it's own director or not. 2nd Units typically have there own director, where as location crews do not (not an absolute by any stretch)
IMO
Charlie Charlie: I understand what you are saying, but the Rules have to have a standard. Simply on the basis of the data there is no way to determine whether what you are saying is valid. I also don't believe I have eversenn or heard much of anything regarding this in any extra feature. If that is the argument you provide then i would be forced to say right now, all such data is invalid and ken must make a decision. Personally speaking, I doubt seriously if it was Ken's intent was to allow for this kind of data at all to begin with, only he can speak to that, but based on past history...I doubt it. We are simply exploiting a hole he left in the rule (probably by accident). Offering up what I know historically , the intent was No secondary crew of any kind, not unit, not location, principal production crew ONLY. But Ken has left a hole, unintentionally I think, the part of this that I find quite funny is where are the users who have jumped all over me when I speak of Full Cast and Crew data entry, I would think that to such users the inclusion of this data would be an utter anathema.. Personally, i don't care, one way or the other, but Ken has to solve it. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
| Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,934 |
| Posted: | | | | Exploitation or not, the door is ajar.
If Ken does not want this, then he needs to come out and say so. The screeners are not helping in the decision. Some are approved, some are not. You would figure that there would be some indication.
I could contend,that by Ken's silence, he may very well be open to such credits, and may very well be analyzing what we are saying. He said that changes have almost always come the way of the forum.
If logic dictates, I would contend that this is the next logical step in the evolution of credit tracking (common name problem aside). At least within these subdivisions, there are credits that do match what we track, and are just as valid.
I am open either way, we just need a word....
Charlie |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | It would make sense that Ken is possibly watching the voting history of submissions like these to see how popular this information would be before deciding whether to include/exclude it officially. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Zombie, Zombie, Zombie | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | @marnix64: Don't understand this at all! Your No Vote: Why making up your own rules? Quote: Rules: List individual credits only, not company name credits. These company name credits should be left out. Quote: Crew and Cast Take Crew Credits from the film credits only; list names exactly as they are in the credits. Exception: If the credit information is entirely capitalized, use standard capitalization rules instead.
Use the "Credited As" field where the person's name differs from the credited name.
List individual credits only, not company name credits. Exception: If a company name heads a group of crew, use the Group divider to enter the company name.
To determine whether to enter the name directly as credited, or to use the "Credited As" field, use the Credit Lookup tool.
It is not necessary to document the source of the common name, outside the use of the CLT. If there is a dispute over whether the credit references the same person, documentation may be necessary. However, in most cases it is not required.
The inclusion of CLT results in contribution notes is strongly desired but not required. Note: In the case of uncertainty, leaving this out may cause the contribution to be declined.
Do not enter union/guild affiliations, such as A.C.E. and B.O.E.
Military rank/affiliation or other honorifics should be included in the 'Credited As' field. Example: a credit of "Cpl. John Smith, USMC" should be entered as First Name: "John", Last Name "Smith", Credited As "Cpl. John Smith, USMC"
Enter birth years only when necessary to differentate between two actors with the same name. When submitting a contribution that adds a birth year to one or more credits, list justification in the contribution notes.
Cast and crew images are not contributed with the profile.
Group names of crew members together within each role available and list in exactly the same order credited. The table below gives each of the crew roles available within DVD Profiler. For each category, include only those people credited with the roles listed in the "Role" and "Credited As" columns. If someone is not credited with one of these roles (or direct translations of these roles), do not include them in the Crew section.
NOTE: Crew entered with a role of "Other" will NOT upload as part of your contribution, and are for your local use only. Crew with a standard role selected will contribute without the Custom Role, if one is entered. rules: Last Updated: May 14, 2010: http://www.invelos.com/dvdpro/contributions/Rules.aspx?display=credits | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Yeah, while the rest of the community is suddenly discussing unit crew, threadstarter marnix64 was actually referring to ANY use of dividers in the crew section, for instance those containing visual effects company names. He's against using dividers for that, and is voting as such. That's what this thread was about. |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | Thanks for clarifying | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | If that is true, Tim, then I think marnix needs to read the current Rules, since in crew that is one of the functions of dividers. So whether he is against it or not is not of any relevance, that is not his call, it is per the rules. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Prof. Kingsfield: Quote: If that is true, Tim, then I think marnix needs to read the current Rules, since in crew that is one of the functions of dividers. So whether he is against it or not is not of any relevance, that is not his call, it is per the rules. I know that and you know that, yeah, but apparently, the no-votes keep coming. Trust me: the rules on how to deal with crew have become so complicated for the average user that most don't even bother to wade through them anymore. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,197 |
| Posted: | | | | Not just the average user, T!M. And I do read the rules, trying to understand them. | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 | | | Last edited: by Nexus the Sixth |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:
Quote: If that is true, Tim, then I think marnix needs to read the current Rules, since in crew that is one of the functions of dividers. So whether he is against it or not is not of any relevance, that is not his call, it is per the rules. I know that and you know that, yeah, but apparently, the no-votes keep coming. Trust me: the rules on how to deal with crew have become so complicated for the average user that most don't even bother to wade through them anymore. I won't disagree nor will I point a finger, though I do understand why this is true . And it's too bad. But matnix still needs to read the Rules. I know the solution beyond that. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|