Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3  Previous   Next
Oz: The Great and Powerful or Oz The Great and Powerful?
Author Message
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTheMadMartian
Alien with an attitude
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 13,201
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting KinoNiki:
Quote:
I'm just still curious what makes this a subtitle, I have read no explanation yet. Is it the large/small letters, or something else?

From what I have seen, yes that is what seems to make it a subtitle...that and the fact that the larger word(s) can stand on their own as a title...though I am not sure it matters as subtitles aren't listed as one of the times a colon can be used. 
No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar
 Last edited: by TheMadMartian
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributormreeder50
I was outta bullets
Registered: March 29, 2007
Reputation: Superior Rating
United States Posts: 2,737
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
"Oz the Great and Powerful" IMHO.

For the record, it's a full blown colon[:]...not a semicolon[;].
Marty - Registered July 10, 2004, User since 2002.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorCubbyUps
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 4,245
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Since a sequel is already in the works, according to IMDB, I'd say a colon should be used.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNexus the Sixth
Contributor since 2002
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Sweden Posts: 3,197
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting CubbyUps:
Quote:
Since a sequel is already in the works, according to IMDB, I'd say a colon should be used.


Which IMDb tentatively names "Oz the Great and Powerful 2" which doesn't speak any more for a colon than the first title does.
First registered: February 15, 2002
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorMike D.
Registered March 20, 2004
Registered: May 8, 2007
United States Posts: 663
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I vote for the colon, since the rules say to.
Quote:
Episode descriptors are part of the title; separate them with a colon and space; e.g. "Star Trek III: The Search for Spock". For multiple descriptors, use a colon and space for each break.
We're on a mission from God.


DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNexus the Sixth
Contributor since 2002
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Sweden Posts: 3,197
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Mike D.:
Quote:
I vote for the colon, since the rules say to.
Quote:
Episode descriptors are part of the title; separate them with a colon and space; e.g. "Star Trek III: The Search for Spock". For multiple descriptors, use a colon and space for each break.


But what makes it an "episode descriptor"?

If the sequel is named Oz: The High and Mighty I might buy that argument, but not yet.
First registered: February 15, 2002
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorscotthm
Registered: March 20, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,850
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Mike D.:
Quote:
I vote for the colon, since the rules say to.

No, it does not.
Quote:
Use the title from the front cover.

---------------
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorateo357
Registered: December 27, 2009
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 5,131
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Kathy:
Quote:
Lopek even brought this issue to the rules committee 6 years ago:

http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=108853&PageNum=1


I've begun to think that forum is where issues go, lingering unresolved, until they die.

The never die, they are like Zombies.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorCubbyUps
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 4,245
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting KinoNiki:
Quote:
Quoting CubbyUps:
Quote:
Since a sequel is already in the works, according to IMDB, I'd say a colon should be used.


Which IMDb tentatively names "Oz the Great and Powerful 2" which doesn't speak any more for a colon than the first title does.



Just like the soon to be released Star Trek sequel was named Star Trek 2 and I'm sure just about every other sequel does.

I think it's clear by the title alone that everything after Oz is describing Oz and thus separate. I guess the real question is should we wait to see what the sequel is officially named and just enter it as what's seen on the cover?
Of course, what happens if they name the sequel something like Oz The Tale of Dorothy. We have an original film and it's sequel with the only thing in common is the first word, Oz. Does the word Oz become the same thing as in other profiles such as Star Trek or Star Wars?

I can see both sides, but being that it's part of a series now, I still think a colon should be used.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorateo357
Registered: December 27, 2009
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 5,131
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
It bad enough with pre-release contributions.
So now lets do a title based on pre-release of a pre-production title. It's as bad as "I saw it in the theater, and the title on-screen was ????".
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorscotthm
Registered: March 20, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,850
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting CubbyUps:
Quote:
I can see both sides, but being that it's part of a series now, I still think a colon should be used.

It may be appropriate if a series of films are made, depending on the titles of future home video releases, but it's not now.

---------------
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorKathy
Registered: May 29, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 3,475
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting ateo357:
Quote:
Quoting Kathy:
Quote:
Lopek even brought this issue to the rules committee 6 years ago:

http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=108853&PageNum=1


I've begun to think that forum is where issues go, lingering unresolved, until they die.


The never die, they are like Zombies.

DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorBehemot
Registered: Aug. 23, 2004
Registered: March 14, 2007
Norway Posts: 555
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
IMO, the title of Oz the Great and Powerful is no different than say Conan the Barbarian, i.e. no colon.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNexus the Sixth
Contributor since 2002
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Sweden Posts: 3,197
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Behemot:
Quote:
IMO, the title of Oz the Great and Powerful is no different than say Conan the Barbarian, i.e. no colon.


And don't forget its sequel Conan the Destroyer. I would be surprised if no one has changed them to include colons yet since they are obviously part of a series. 
First registered: February 15, 2002
 Last edited: by Nexus the Sixth
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorbbbbb
on steroids
Registered: March 14, 2007
Posts: 5,734
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Harry Potter: and the Philosopher's Stone
Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect]
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorKathy
Registered: May 29, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 3,475
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting KinoNiki:
Quote:
Quoting Kathy:
Quote:

I suggest that people go through their collections and see how they are set up. The few I checked has the vast majority using the colon as a separator.


It is generally not an area I pay much attention to, nor am I consistent I'm sure. But I thought we were discussing how to enter it for the online, not our personal collections. All my titles are locked btw and have been so for years.



This situation has been cropping up since the intervocative days and the powers that be have never stepped in and clarified the situation.

So, it has been left to the community to contribute this data based on how they read the rules, the numerous discussions, past practice etc.

The result has been that the vast majority of contributors and contributions are entered and accepted into the online database utilizing the colon as a separation indicator.

For example, in your collection there are titles that include a colon such as Beverly Hills Cop: The Complete Lineup.

I am discussing the online database since the colon has been added, entered, voted on and accepted into the online database.

This is the reason I previously suggested each person take a look at their local database. This is especially important for those who do not believe a colon is correct.
 Last edited: by Kathy
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3  Previous   Next