|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 5 ...8 Previous Next
|
Do we add... |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Prof. Kingsfield: Quote: Reybr:
I find your response to be self-serving and disappointing. But I thought the online db was supposed to serve all users. --------------- |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 906 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Prof. Kingsfield: Quote: And as I said, NO conditional, we either list Music Supervisors or we don't. That's also an argument I can't understand. Didn't you say that you didn't want Music Supervisors entered as music because we wouldn't know what they actually did? If we get a whole new field for Music Supervisors (I don't think I even want one), we would still not know what they actually did since the job a music supervisor has changed so drastically from the 1930s. Regarding conditionals, are you sure that they would confuse that much? I've seen that statement from you many times, but I don't think it's true and have seen nothing here that says it would be a problem introducing more conditionals in the rules. Conditionals are after all very logical. If ... then ... else. Very basic language really. | | | The colour of her eyes, were the colour of insanity |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting reybr: Quote: I don't understand how that doesn't make him a composer. The problem is that DVD Profiler has a nasty tendency to not to track what someone actually did, but to merely track (or leave out) the label that he's given by the credits. As soon as the filmmakers give the Supervising Sound Editor a Supervising Sound Effects Editor label, then poof! Suddenly the guy doesn't get a credit in our database anymore, even though he performed the exact same job. Same with the special effects guys: on one film, they're credited as a group of "Special Effects", and they're entered, and on the next film, they're credited as "Special Effects Technicians", and they're out. On the other hand, some people will happily enter a TV show's story editor as a film editor when he's credited on-screen as the "Supervising Editor". I see examples like this every single day. It's all very unfortunate, and I try my best to fix what I can, but I'm guessing that it boils down to the fact that a set of rules that actually allow all the right people in while leaving all the wrong people out is pretty much impossible to write. Especially with the same labels being used to describe different jobs over the years. As it stands, I think the best thing would indeed be more conditionals, so that we could allow a "Music Supervisor" only if there's nobody else credited for the score. Same for the costume department: only add one of the "lesser" credits when there's no actual "costume designer" credit, and so on. Anything like that, I would wholeheartedly support, but I'd hate to see something that would cause users to award an equal "composer" credit to thousands of today's Music Supervisors. If that's our choice - all of them in, or all of them out - then I'd rather leave them out, and I'd track those that I personally knew to be valid locally. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:
Quote: Reybr:
I find your response to be self-serving and disappointing. But I thought the online db was supposed to serve all users.
--------------- Indeed scott, you only see me talking about in the here and now, long term i want to see ken allow it and modify the program so that it really has meaning. In the short run where we are right now...NO but that's not because iof ME, that;s because of a program limitation. And based on the poll the result was a resounding NO as well, which I am sure would change if ken simply either added Music Supervisor to the Program itself or gave us open creds. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 906 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: I'd hate to see something that would cause users to award an equal "composer" credit to thousands of today's Music Supervisors. In perfect agreement | | | The colour of her eyes, were the colour of insanity |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: Quoting reybr:
Quote: I don't understand how that doesn't make him a composer. The problem is that DVD Profiler has a nasty tendency to not to track what someone actually did, but to merely track (or leave out) the label that he's given by the credits. As soon as the filmmakers give the Supervising Sound Editor a Supervising Sound Effects Editor label, then poof! Suddenly the guy doesn't get a credit in our database anymore, even though he performed the exact same job. Same with the special effects guys: on one film, they're credited as a group of "Special Effects", and they're entered, and on the next film, they're credited as "Special Effects Technicians", and they're out. On the other hand, some people will happily enter a TV show's story editor as a film editor when he's credited on-screen as the "Supervising Editor". I see examples like this every single day. It's all very unfortunate, and I try my best to fix what I can, but I'm guessing that it boils down to the fact that a set of rules that actually allow all the right people in while leaving all the wrong people out is pretty much impossible to write. Especially with the same labels being used to describe different jobs over the years.
As it stands, I think the best thing would indeed be more conditionals, so that we could allow a "Music Supervisor" only if there's nobody else credited for the score. Same for the costume department: only add one of the "lesser" credits when there's no actual "costume designer" credit, and so on. Anything like that, I would wholeheartedly support, but I'd hate to see something that would cause users to award an equal "composer" credit to thousands of today's Music Supervisors. If that's our choice - all of them in, or all of them out - then I'd rather leave them out, and I'd track those that I personally knew to be valid locally. Tim: I don't want to see Rules based conditionals for well-known reasons, so i don't think I need to repeat them, do I. Now if Ken can create program based conditionals, let's go. I'm ready for it. From a Rules point of view Music Supervisor, all or nothing, no conditional, but a program based conditional which will lock out data that does not meet the conditional then cool. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | I'm fine with either solution. The "Sound" conditional is doing absolute wonders, so I really don't have a problem with them. I don't see any of the confusion you seem to be afraid of. If I'm looking at this a testcase for whether we should have more of those conditionals, I'd say: bring 'em on! But again: if something like this can be further enforced by a program-based conditional ("graying out" additional options when a certain credit is assigned) I'm fine with that as well. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting reybr: Quote: It's not hard at all, but does it make any sense? Not in my opinion. Good thing is that the rules allow it to be entered. It is allowed ONLY if he is the person who composed the films original score. As a Music Supervisor doesn't do that, he isn't allowed. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar | | | Last edited: by TheMadMartian |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote: Quoting reybr:
Quote: It's not hard at all, but does it make any sense? Not in my opinion. Good thing is that the rules allow it to be entered. It is allowed ONLY if he is the person who composed the films original score. As a Music Supervisor doesn't do that, he isn't allowed. Yes but Reybr's point is that the Music Supervisor used to. And from the tone of his posts I believe that's the only time Reybr intends to contribute them. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote: Yes but Reybr's point is that the Music Supervisor used to. And from the tone of his posts I believe that's the only time Reybr intends to contribute them. Ah, I guess I missed that portion of the thread. Thanks for clearing that up. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | No problem! And for the record, I fully support a conditional added to the rules (just like the sound one) making sure that is the only time they are contributed. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | No not entirely correct north. I beieve her has stated that Oliver Wallace has been credited as both compose and Music Supervisor in separarte films and it is his contention that if he was a Music Composer then his Music Supervisor credit=Music Composer. That logic is both wrong and twisted. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,759 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: The problem is that DVD Profiler has a nasty tendency to not to track what someone actually did, but to merely track (or leave out) the label that he's given by the credits. As soon as the filmmakers give the Supervising Sound Editor a Supervising Sound Effects Editor label, then poof! Suddenly the guy doesn't get a credit in our database anymore, even though he performed the exact same job. Same with the special effects guys: on one film, they're credited as a group of "Special Effects", and they're entered, and on the next film, they're credited as "Special Effects Technicians", and they're out. On the other hand, some people will happily enter a TV show's story editor as a film editor when he's credited on-screen as the "Supervising Editor". I see examples like this every single day. (...) That's why I have always supported to assign roles by function and not by label. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | All I can say on this matter... all this does is push me further and further from doing crew data. Every time I think I get to slightly understand any of it... something else pops up and confuses me even more.
I still think the only way to make it easy enough for everyone to contribute the data is give use a text field to type in the crew role... instead of trying to fit all this stuff into the roles we have now. | | | Pete |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Pete the road they have us on right now, I won't Contribute no how no way, not worth it, not fun, hasn't been for a long time. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,934 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote: All I can say on this matter... all this does is push me further and further from doing crew data. Every time I think I get to slightly understand any of it... something else pops up and confuses me even more.
I still think the only way to make it easy enough for everyone to contribute the data is give use a text field to type in the crew role... instead of trying to fit all this stuff into the roles we have now. Yes!!! Modified open credits.... |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 5 ...8 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|