Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ...12  Previous   Next
Stereo vs. Surround
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorDarklyNoon
No Godz, No Masterz
Registered: May 8, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Germany Posts: 1,945
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Kinoniki:
Quote:
We're not talking about cinema.


Well, aren't we talking about the films audio ?
I truuly hope that people here have accepted that 2-Channle Stereo is non existing in cinema.

Accepting that we move over to DVD and Blu-ray.
The films audio on those disks is also never stereo it is eiither mono or surround, 5.1 , 7.1 and so on, cannot be bothered to name all audio formats here.

Then we move on to the commentary track. At least with the hundreds of commentary tracks I listened to, you have the sound of the film in the background and when no one of the commentary people speaks you have it in the foreground. And that film soundtrack is either mono or surrround and so on, but it is NOT 2-Chan Stereo. (remember it is not existing )

So we are at the point again, where no one can proof and distinguish between Stereo and Surround, as the Surround Flag is always set, no receiver or amplifier can tell you the truth.

But with the knowledge that 2-Chan Stereo in cinema is non-existing, I really do not see what the problems are.

cheers
Donnie
www.tvmaze.com
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorbob9000
safety word?
Registered: March 13, 2007
Canada Posts: 844
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting DarklyNoon:
Quote:
But with the knowledge that 2-Chan Stereo in cinema is non-existing, I really do not see what the problems are.

cheers
Donnie

So you believe. Next you will be telling us that Mono does not exist in Modern cinema either.
 Last edited: by bob9000
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorArdos
Registered: July 31, 2008
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 2,506
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting DarklyNoon:
Quote:


So we are at the point again, where no one can proof and distinguish between Stereo and Surround, as the Surround Flag is always set, no receiver or amplifier can tell you the truth.


I've got plenty of DVDs that have stereo audio, confirmed on my AV receiver. Mostly, UK TV series, but to say they don't exist or can't be distinguished is simply not true.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantAlien Redrum
Proudly blocked by liars.
Registered: August 23, 2008
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 1,656
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Mithi:
Quote:
Quoting DarklyNoon:
Quote:
Commentary tracks always use the film soundtrack in the background, and as this is always Surround, the commentary track is also surround

Faulty logic.
Even IF they use the film soundtrack as a background, this says nothing on how it got mixed in. The commentor might just as will sit in a booth with a single microphone and watch the movie on a simple TV set. Pray tell how would there be anything more than "mono" possible?


On Tartan's release of Perth, the commentary was recorded in a closet for acoustics as the director watched the DVD on a laptop (IIRC).
Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com

"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorbigdaddyhorse
Registered: June 21, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,621
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Most commentaries are different. Some you can clearly hear the movie behind the people, some you can't. Some have different audio for the film, Return of the Living Dead commentary is over the original audio track, not the "re-mastered" mess that's on the dvd. I'm pretty sure I recall one commentary mentioning how they didn't have sound, and another who didn't have picture!
My favorites are Scream and Natural Born Killers, where there's talking about stuff not there since the comm was for the uncut versions, then played over the cut dvds. With Natural Born Killers if you watch the R-cut Stone will talk about how "this cut flows better" and refer to all the things you can only see in this cut, while you can't see them.

The only thing more annoying than this is the deleted scenes on Devil's Advocate, where the director keeps telling you to listen to the dialogue, but never shuts up for half a second! You can make out maybe one word per minute if that over his rambling. Worse of all, it's all mono so I couldn't even unplug speakers in hopes of hearing the dialogue. Oh yeah, no subtitles or captions for them either!
 Last edited: by bigdaddyhorse
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAce_of_Sevens
Registered: December 10, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Posts: 3,004
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
It easy to tell the difference. You put the disc in the player, make sure your receiver is in pro-logic mode and see what happens.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorDarklyNoon
No Godz, No Masterz
Registered: May 8, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Germany Posts: 1,945
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Forget_the_Rest:
Quote:
Quoting DarklyNoon:
Quote:


So we are at the point again, where no one can proof and distinguish between Stereo and Surround, as the Surround Flag is always set, no receiver or amplifier can tell you the truth.


I've got plenty of DVDs that have stereo audio, confirmed on my AV receiver. Mostly, UK TV series, but to say they don't exist or can't be distinguished is simply not true.


Your receiver cannot confirm stereo and I was talking about cinema and not tv, in the 70s and 80s there were quite a few tv series in plain stereo, that is right.

cheers
Donnie
www.tvmaze.com
 Last edited: by DarklyNoon
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorDarklyNoon
No Godz, No Masterz
Registered: May 8, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Germany Posts: 1,945
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
This was said by a user called schaumi here a few months ago. it explains everything perfectly:

To find out the real 2.0 sound format on a DVD or Blu-ray is not always simple. Often the producers of the discs do not know either the true format of their programs, nor do most computer programs like PowerDVD and others. That results in often misleading logos on the cover and/or display on amplifier or PC screen. There is indeed only one reliable way to find out what is really on the discs: Listen and think!

The 2.0 mono programs are quite easy to unmask. Simply activate the DOLBY ProLogic mode on your amplifier. If only the center is audible, it is definitely a mono signal. (If the signals are not splitted precisely, there may come a minimal portion of sound out of the left and right speakers but hardly audible because of the dominance of the center signal.)

If left and right speaker are obviously audible, is it either stereo or Surround. To find out which is which is a bit more tricky. That is because on their way through the ProLogic matrix all stereo signals send also sound information to the rear speakers (and to the center). Even simple stereo audio CDs send accidentally signals to the back, as soon as the ProLogic matrix is activated. From now on you have to use your brain.

Possibility 1: The template was a feature film that was originally made for cinema distribution. Then it cannot be simple two-channel-left-and-right-stereo. In cinema there was never pure two-channel-stereo! Since the invention of the talkies 1927 there was always a center channel (and still is there until today). A feature film for cinema is either in mono or has four or more sound channels.

(One exception: In the 50's there was actually a triple track format (L,C,R), which today is history. You can find it e.g. on the DVD of Billy Wilders The Seven Year Itch. A list of feature film sound formats you may find by clicking the following link: http://www.mtsu.edu/~smpte/table.html.)

Possibility 2: The program was produced directly for TV or is it a music video or music documentary or concert footage, there is indeed the chance of real two channel left-and-right stereo which should be listened to favoured in stereo mode on your ampflifier as well as it can be DOLBY SURROUND (which then normally is indicated in the titles and/or on the cover). Anyway, here you have to rely on the information on the cover, on the disc or in the titles.

Keeping that in mind, you can ascertain the following at least for cinema related features on DVD and Blu-ray when 2.0 sound is stated: Is the sound coming just out of the center (with activated ProLogic mode), it is obviously a mono program. In all other cases we have matrixed four channel sound, on DVD usually called DD 2.0 Surround.
A useful hint is also the DOLBY STEREO logo in the end credts which points to matrixed four channel Surround sound.) 2.0 stereo is only possible for not cinema related programs such as TV series or music content.

cheers+
Donnie
www.tvmaze.com
 Last edited: by DarklyNoon
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNexus the Sixth
Contributor since 2002
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Sweden Posts: 3,197
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting DarklyNoon:
Quote:
So we are at the point again, where no one can proof and distinguish between Stereo and Surround, as the Surround Flag is always set, no receiver or amplifier can tell you the truth.


If that is so, why do we need to record this "impossible to distinguish" information?

This is purely academic anyway, since we can't even select surround for the HD formats, only 2-channel stereo. My suggestion is to rename it and use it for both types. End of speculation.
First registered: February 15, 2002
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantGraveworm
Registered: April 7, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 357
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
They are only surround if they have the out of phase information. Just because cinema has 4 channels doesn't mean all sound tracks had the 4 channels since many dubbed tracks were intended for VHS playback, TV broadcast or done on the cheap for a limited market. BTW linking to this thread is not a source for changing all stereo dubbed tracks to surround. If the disk claims its stereo then you'll need a source to say the disk is wrong.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorDarklyNoon
No Godz, No Masterz
Registered: May 8, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Germany Posts: 1,945
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Possibility 1: The template was a feature film that was originally made for cinema distribution. Then it cannot be simple two-channel-left-and-right-stereo. In cinema there was never pure two-channel-stereo! Since the invention of the talkies 1927 there was always a center channel (and still is there until today). A feature film for cinema is either in mono or has four or more sound channels.

Well if this and the rest of what schaumi wrote doesn't convince you, I cannot help you anymore.
I will change everything in my collection to those standards and will submit it. And nearly everyone votes YES so far.
If a few disagree, then fine, they can vote NO, and the screeners will decide.

I and many others whom I am in contact with are done here getting bullied or getting the blabla speech "Oh i was here even before the invention of time, you have to obey me"

Many of those who couldn't stand the behaviour and attitude of those few have left and do everything local and give a crap about the online database nowadays.
The few bullies do not realise that they do nothing for the database and this community.
The ones doing the valuable stuff are the ones that contribute regularly, the ones making layouts, making add-ons, making headshots, adding trivia, adding galleries .
People like Taro, goodguy, Dr Killpatient, SpaceFreakMicha, VirusPil and so many others, those are the ones helping this community and not the minorty that only can do blablablabla.
But the ones that are not dragged away, do not care anymore what those few say.

I was very polite here for many years, never said one harsh word to others , always tried to be nice and trying to find a middle way.
This is over now. I will do my contributions according to the rules, as I always did.. You will never find a thing that is against the rules in my contributions and if someone finds something and politely sends me a pm or does a valuable NO vote, I will of course change it.

But I am done replying to ridiculous statements from people who obviously have no clue what they are talking about.
And I am more than happy if I can get valuable and correct data into the online database and even more happy if those few troublemakers do not like that this is getting into the database.

cheers
Donnie
www.tvmaze.com
 Last edited: by DarklyNoon
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorbob9000
safety word?
Registered: March 13, 2007
Canada Posts: 844
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Wow, he cannot provide a relevant argument, so he insults anyone who disagrees with him. Classy.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributortweeter
I aim to misbehave
Registered: June 12, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 2,665
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Be careful what you vote on out there.  Changes are being made without actual verification.

Example: Blade Runner (085391-185741): the 5 Disc set. 
All Dolby Digital 2-Channel Stereo tracks are being changed to Dolby Digital Dolby Surround when they in fact are simply Stereo (DD 2.0: a fact my receiver displays in big letters on the front panel, it would have told me if they were Surround, but they aren't)
Bad movie?  You're soaking in it!
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorbob9000
safety word?
Registered: March 13, 2007
Canada Posts: 844
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collection
Be careful voting no, this is the latest PM Darkly sent me for daring to disagree with him and voting no:
Quoting DarklyNoon:
Forum Moderator: Removed. Do not quote PMs in the forum.
unbelievable, and more than a little sad
 Last edited: by Forum Moderator
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorDarklyNoon
No Godz, No Masterz
Registered: May 8, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Germany Posts: 1,945
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Tweeter you also have zero knowledge about that stuff, the only one working in the business here is "schaumi" and he perfectly explains how it is.
The majority of Yes votes also make it clear that most of the people actually understand that 2-channel stereo is non existing.

period
Donnie
www.tvmaze.com
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorDarklyNoon
No Godz, No Masterz
Registered: May 8, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Germany Posts: 1,945
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Posting PMS in the forum will surely get you banned now, what already should get you banned is to add Blu-Rays to your collection just to be able to vote NO to my contributions.

Oh yeh , it is fun to finally payback those bullies that made this forum hell for 98 % of all the users.

keep it coming guys.

cheers
Donnie
www.tvmaze.com
 Last edited: by DarklyNoon
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ...12  Previous   Next