| Author |
Message |
| Registered: August 23, 2008 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 1,656 |
| | Posted: | | | | | | | Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com
"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo. |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote:
Quoting Ace_of_Sevens:
Quote:
A movie can quite easily have multiple special effects supervisors with each one being in charge of a sequence or two, but that's not like being assistant special effect supervisor.
A movie can quite easily have multiple additional composers working on it, each supplying the music for a sequence or two. Same thing, but we still don't track those "additional music by" credits.  As I already explained, the rules tell us that Compser is "Used for the composer of the film's Original Score." Someone who supplies the music for a sequence or two, didn't compose the score, they supplied additional music. Why you keep ignoring that fact, I do not know, but it is not the same thing at all. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar | | | | Last edited: by TheMadMartian |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Ace_of_Sevens: Quote:
Weren't you the guy who wanted to add robotic effects supervisor? How is that consistent.
A movie can quite easily have multiple special effects supervisors with each one being in charge of a sequence or two, but that's not like being assistant special effect supervisor.
Think of it this way: Movies these days pretty much have directing, sound and cinematography throughout. Special effects, not so much. Irrelevant, Ace and off topic, that has NOTHING to do with ADDITIONAL in ANY way. Akip  | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Prof. Kingsfield: Quote:
Irrelevant, Ace and off topic, that has NOTHING to do with ADDITIONAL in ANY way.
Akip In your opinion. In mine, it has everything to do with it. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | And of course, your opinion is muy importante, si?
BTW, just for fun and I know what your response will be, please, Martian, take note of this poll results,. Concisely put, according to the Poll, we don't do ADDITIONAL anythings. OH, I know you are goibng to say Polls are meaningless...yada, yada, yada.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video | | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
| | Registered: July 31, 2008 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 2,506 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Prof. Kingsfield: Quote:
And of course, your opinion is muy importante, si?
Skip No more or less important than anyone here (other than Ken & Gerri on program/site issues). |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | I won't disagree, Forget, not at all. I advised that at this time we don't do Additional, which happens to be also consistent with this Poll and others that have been done. Twas not I that started parsing and spinning to try and allow data to be entered inconsistently. And started entering straw man arguments and so forth. This is simple a straight forward, at this time we do not do additional, maybe tomorrow it will be different but not today.
Skip<shrugs> | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Prof. Kingsfield: Quote:
And of course, your opinion is muy importante, si?
BTW, just for fun and I know what your response will be, please, Martian, take note of this poll results,. Concisely put, according to the Poll, we don't do ADDITIONAL anythings. OH, I know you are goibng to say Polls are meaningless...yada, yada, yada.
Skip The poll is asking about "Unit Crew", not "Additional Crew". I believe those are two completely separate issues. Personally, I never enter anything listed under a "company" header. | | | | Hal | | | | Last edited: by hal9g |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Good point, touche. See what happens when we get off topic.  I agree that company data is important to capture as I explained earlier. But again, at this time we don't do that, and that also nothing to do with ADDITIONAL, and we have never done additional to date, that doesn't mean that tomorrow, next week or next version we might not but not at this time, Additional has been discussed previously. We don't sometimes do something and sometimes not, we do it for ALL additional or NONE of them and to date it has been NONE, and i am fine with that, I would be fine if we do Additional, I am not fine with someone trying to parse and spin, throw in straw man arguments, in order to try and support SOMETIMES. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Prof. Kingsfield: Quote:
And of course, your opinion is muy importante, si? No más o menos importante que cualquier otro usuario. Quote:
BTW, just for fun and I know what your response will be, please, Martian, take note of this poll results,. Concisely put, according to the Poll, we don't do ADDITIONAL anythings. OH, I know you are goibng to say Polls are meaningless...yada, yada, yada. Actually, that isn't what i am going to say. What I am going to say is, the poll deals with Unit Crew. These are not Unit Crew.  Edit: I see hal beat me to it. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar | | | | Last edited: by TheMadMartian |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote:
The poll is asking about "Unit Crew", not "Additional Crew". I believe those are two completely separate issues.
Personally, I never enter anything listed under a "company" header. That is unfortunate as it leaves out a lot of important information. I have seen, more than a few CG films, where the only sound crew listed, is listed under a company header. The animation was done by the studio and all the sound was done by, as an example, Skywalker Sound. I would hate to lose that information simply because it was under a company header. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote:
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
The poll is asking about "Unit Crew", not "Additional Crew". I believe those are two completely separate issues.
Personally, I never enter anything listed under a "company" header.
That is unfortunate as it leaves out a lot of important information. I have seen, more than a few CG films, where the only sound crew listed, is listed under a company header. The animation was done by the studio and all the sound was done by, as an example, Skywalker Sound. I would hate to lose that information simply because it was under a company header. I never vote against people who enter them...I just don't do it myself. I think we have way to many crew credits already. | | | | Hal |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote:
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
The poll is asking about "Unit Crew", not "Additional Crew". I believe those are two completely separate issues.
Personally, I never enter anything listed under a "company" header.
That is unfortunate as it leaves out a lot of important information. I have seen, more than a few CG films, where the only sound crew listed, is listed under a company header. The animation was done by the studio and all the sound was done by, as an example, Skywalker Sound. I would hate to lose that information simply because it was under a company header. No, you don't lose the data, Martian, you lose the context of the data. That is as important as the data itself as I have explained but...not right now. I hope that ken will change this, and as I said as far as I'm concerned additional is fine as long as we do it all, not just some of it based on parsing or spin to get sometimes yes and sometimes no. Right now it's no. Skip<shrugs> | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
|