| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 1,414 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr Pavlov: Quote:
Quoting gardibolt:
Quote:
That's absolutely unacceptable. I'm done with this program.
What a stupid change, just to placate the people who don't like uncredited cast.
Gard:
It has nothing to do with liking or not liking (uncredited) data, but it must be documented. If it is documented I won't argue with it.
Skip Then why are you supporting changes that allow removal of documented uncredited by idiots forgetting to check a box? | | | | "This movie has warped my fragile little mind." |
|
| Registered: March 10, 2007 |  Posts: 4,282 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting gardibolt: Quote:
Then why are you supporting changes that allow removal of documented uncredited by idiots forgetting to check a box? That's not the way this feature works. It does not remove existing uncredited cast. | | | | Invelos Software, Inc. Representative | | | | Last edited: by Ken Cole |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,759 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr Pavlov: Quote:
It has nothing to do with liking or not liking (uncredited) data, but it must be documented. If it is documented I won't argue with it.
Skip Uncredited cast has only to be documented/verified if you want to add them to a profile. The uncredited cast which already is in the profile doesn't have to be documented/verified. On the other side, if you want to remove uncredited cast, you have to document/verify the removal as well. |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting gardibolt: Quote:
Then why are you supporting changes that allow removal of documented uncredited by idiots forgetting to check a box? Gardibolt, if that is the behaviour you are seeing then you need to let Ken know, that's not the way it's supposed to work. |
|
| Registered: April 3, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,998 |
| | Posted: | | | | I need some voting advise.
Question: If copping cast from an existing profile you now have to document the uncredited or link to the other profiles documentation for the uncredited? Yes/No |
|
| Registered: April 14, 2007 | | Posts: 415 |
| |
| Registered: June 12, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,665 |
| | Posted: | | | | Yes and ideally, if documented in another profile and you have room in the notes just copy/paste the Uncredited documentation to the new profile from the old. | | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting ninehours: Quote:
I need some voting advise.
Question: If copping cast from an existing profile you now have to document the uncredited or link to the other profiles documentation for the uncredited? Yes/No No, most of the OLD data was grandfathered in, this does not mean it is accurate, unless there are notes that provide documentation then it should not be accepted or Contributed, copying an old profile does nothing. the hows and the whys tor the old (uncredited) data have been explained too many times rto count. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting ninehours: Quote:
I need some voting advise.
Question: If copping cast from an existing profile you now have to document the uncredited or link to the other profiles documentation for the uncredited? Yes/No Yes that's right. Although as Tweeter says it may be easier to simply copy & paste the documentation. |
|
| Registered: April 3, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,998 |
| | Posted: | | | | Well i voted and left a comment stating this and the person graciously reposted without the uncredited |
|