Quoting bbbbb:

Quote:
Quoting Unicus69:

Quote:
Quoting bbbbb:

Quote:
Divergent credits are already rather rare, but erroneous contributions absolutely unproven.

At worst eradicated by our voting and screening process.

So T!M is right.

I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

Not one single user cares about whether credits differ between different home video releases of the same film in all these bbbbB-bbBbb-Bbbbb common name type of topics.

What is your opinion about those surveys, and their results?

Careful, bbbb. First off if I know Ubicus he DOES care aand so do I. DOn't presume to ralk for me, when you make such sweeping comments. But even if we are the ONLY two that should not be discounted.

Mike I am right there with you, and I will wager  that you could have guessed that.

Skip

Quoting Berak:

Quote:
Quoting bbbbb:

Quote:
We had "happy funtimeing idiot you are!" from Berak to T!M on page 2.

Would you like one as well?

At one time members condemned personal insults and attacks in the forums. The times are gone it seems.

Send me a private message if you can't control the compulsion to utter offensive language.

Quoting Berak:

Quote:
How can you claim that not one single user cares? Have you spoken to all of us, or even bothered reading this whole thread?

I even read "Why keep some people changing contributions from other countries ?", "Clayton Hartley/ Clayton R Hartley/ Clayton R. Hartley/ Clay Hartley" and "José Ramón Rosario a.k.a. José Ramón Rosario a.k.a. José Rosario".

And compared with you I'm competent to draw conclusions from it.

How many of T!M's contributions have been proven wrong (regarding the topic credit variations between different regions, localities or formats)?

Also, bbbbb, you should not presume tio make broad sweeping assumptions such as you did which just patently are not true. What you do with those kind of statements is prove that you do not understand the difference between your local database, which has to meet ONLY your standards and the Online which must serve ALL users and because of this has Rules spelled out as they do. If you do not want your data to reflect the data online but instead meets some criteria which you have established for YOURSELF, that is fine, your database SHOULD serve your needs, but it is not right for you to then try and impose those standards on the rest of the worlds, which is in effect what Tim is doing, though it appears as though he MAY have stopped trying to adjust the entire world catalog to the standard of what he owns, I hope so anyway.

Skip

Quoting Jubal:

Quote:
I think we can safely say that probably 95% of what tim does is fine, but that 5% has problems due variations.

No single one, then.

You should be thankful for the countless corrections to the Online your local lot was too lazy to do.

Quoting tweeter:

Quote:
Quoting bbbbb:

Quote:
Not one single user cares about whether credits differ between different home video releases of the same film in all these bbbbB-bbBbb-Bbbbb common name type of topics.

Disproved by the fact that 1) people respond to these threads and 2) people created the threads.

Quite the contrary. I never heard one single user complain about the method these threads claim to determine the common name with. Or about the use of the results as source when contributing common name changes/additions.

Quoting Forget_the_Rest:

Quote:
Not quite the same thing as I believe the user does own the title but there's a submission currently up where the user is adding filmratings.com details to a UK profile. I'd be more likely to allow cast/crew to be just copied from one locality to another than I am to allow a different rating board's standards be copied to another locality!!

Well, this one is a rule violation as the rules tell us to use the region-specific ratings information website that is the equivalent to filmratings.com.