| Registered: February 26, 2008 | | Posts: 29 |
| | Posted: | | | | Format of poll choices: Title (Edition)  The title for this database record is currently Gandhi: 25th Anniversary, with the edition listed as "2-Disc". "25th Anniversary" is an edition and not part of the title. The words "2-Disc" are printed as a small black icon in the lower-right corner of the front cover, rather than as a banner like a normal edition tag. It is obvious that "25th Anniversary" needs to be in the Edition field. The question is whether "2-Disc" should also be included, and if so, how. There probably won't be a consensus on this, but a sampling of people's opinions will give me an idea on how to resubmit this entry. | | | | One man's rip-off is another man's homage. |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | The current title is certainly wrong. I personally went for option 1 and wouldn't bother to mention the 2-disc bit. |
|
| Registered: July 31, 2008 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,506 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would go with option 1 as well. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 1,774 |
| | Posted: | | | | Right, "Gandhi" as title, "25th Anniversary" as edition. | | | | Last edited: by SpaceFreakMicha |
|
| Registered: June 5, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 93 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would say "2 Disc" only needs to be added to the Edition field if there were another similar release, so as to properly differentiate it. i.e. If they released a "Gandhi 25th Anniversary Edition 1-Disc", or "Gandhi 25th Anniversary Edition 3-Disc", etc. Since those don't exist, then it doesn't need to be added. Even if they released a 1-Disc or 3-Disc or "blah-blah" release, this title reached the database first, so can claim the right to not needing the differentiator, while the newer releases would  | | | | You can download higher resolution versions of any of my cover scans from here |
|