Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 844 |
| Posted: | | | | So I have this joker who submitted the Canadian blu-ray release [883929-095032] to the US locality. I PMed him about it and he said some rude stuff then blocked me. Since he declined to make the correction and another user had already submitted the profile to the Canada locality, I went ahead and made a submission explaning why it should be deleted. This genius is now voting no on it with a little buddy of his and is even claiming that the cover has a US rating (which is a complete lie, it only has the Canadian one and is bilingual to boot) and accusing me of damaging the DB. I have since modified my contribution notes with some stronger wording, but what are my chances of the reviewers overlooking the votes and reading my notes in full?
On a personal note I have never seen such childish behaviour in my life. If someone points out a mistake I made in a contributuon I thank them and fix it. I guess this guy feels that attacking and lying are a better way to go. | | | Last edited: by bob9000 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | from my experience if you vote No with an explanation.. Chances are very good that your one vote No will overrule all Yes's when it comes to the final decision by the panel... | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry | | | Last edited: by widescreenforever |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 844 |
| Posted: | | | | Well the original submitter and a little buddy of his managed managed to vote down the update. I have resubmitted it with more detailed notes including multiple links showing that 883929-095032 is only sold by Canadian retailers. Hopfully the reviewers will actually pay attention to the evidence and disregard their no votes as biased. |
|