| Author |
Message |
| Registered: April 3, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 1,998 |
| | Posted: | | | | Just want to check i voted correctly Are "Music Supervisors" allowed under this rule Quote:
Do include "Supervising" credits in the above categories, examples: "Supervising Art Director", "Makeup Supervisor", except where explicity forbidden above. BTW: just noticed there is a spelling mistake in this rule |
|
| Registered: September 30, 2008 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 1,805 |
| | Posted: | | | | I didn't take the rule to mean that at all. Music Supervisor is a vastly different role from composer (or song writer) from my understanding.
I wouldn't include it, and I'd vote no to any contribution that tried to include it. | | | | The night is calling. And it whispers to me soflty come and play. |
|
| Registered: May 9, 2007 |  Posts: 1,536 |
| | Posted: | | | | I don't get it.
A Supervising Art Director is an Art Director (existing option).
A Supervising Makeup Artist is a Makeup Artist (exiting option).
But a Music Supervisor does not supervise any person, (s)he supervises music? What credit would you propose to use? | | | | Hans |
|
| Registered: April 3, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,998 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Staid S Barr: Quote:
I don't get it.
A Supervising Art Director is an Art Director (existing option).
A Supervising Makeup Artist is a Makeup Artist (exiting option).
But a Music Supervisor does not supervise any person, (s)he supervises music? What credit would you propose to use? None, thats why i voted NO | | | | Last edited: by ninehours |
|
| Registered: May 9, 2007 | | Posts: 1,536 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting ninehours: Quote:
None, thats why i voted NO Good, so we all agree. (But that wasn't in your original mail).  | | | | Hans |
|
| Registered: April 3, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,998 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Staid S Barr: Quote:
Quoting ninehours:
Quote:
None, thats why i voted NO
Good, so we all agree. (But that wasn't in your original mail). But i did put Quote:
Just want to check i voted correctly did not add which way i voted so as not to skew the poll |
|
| Registered: September 30, 2008 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,805 |
| | Posted: | | | | Just wondering for anyone voting yes (I see there are 3 yes votes so far), what role would this be placed under? | | | | The night is calling. And it whispers to me soflty come and play. |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 6,730 |
| | Posted: | | | | Technically they are allowed, there's just no role to sort them to. So my vote is "Other". | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting goblinsdoitall: Quote:
Technically they are allowed, there's just no role to sort them to. So my vote is "Other". I voted the same way for the same reason... since the rules do not make an exception for music it is allowed... whether it makes sense or not. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | The notes for 'Music by' read, "Used for the composer of the film's Original Score." The Music Supervisor did not compose the film's original score, so should not be entered. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | This is true... that is a good point!  | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: June 12, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,665 |
| | Posted: | | | | Nor should they be entered as Song Writers (in case someone wanted to).
The roles and notes in the Rules simply preclude Music Supervisors. | | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! |
|
| Registered: May 18, 2007 | | Posts: 389 |
| | Posted: | | | | What about "Supervising Producers" ? |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Orici: Quote:
What about "Supervising Producers" ? They're permitted. | | | | Hal |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,730 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote:
Quoting Orici:
Quote:
What about "Supervising Producers" ?
They're permitted. Yupp, but not the "Production Supervisor" Please note the difference | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | | Posts: 823 |
| | Posted: | | | | A little related, I never did find out what the difference is between "Executive Producer" and "Executive in Charge of Production" | | | | 99.9% of all cat plans consist only of "Step 1." |
|