Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 20,111 |
| Posted: | | | | In the splatter/gore film The Dead Next Door, there is a visual credit in the end credits as this: Jon Killough definitely receives a credit as Crazy Grady Zombie, but would you also credit "A Neat Fake Head"? It obviously refers only to the Make-up Mask effect (almost a Make-up Crew reference really) and not an actual actor. I'd be interested in hearing some opinions on how to enter it correctly. | | | Corey |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | For "joke" credits like this I tend to use the "credited as" to show what's screen
So in this case I would put Jon//Killough [Jon Killough and a Neat Fake Head] as "Crazy Grady Zombie" |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 1,777 |
| Posted: | | | | Personally I wouldn't credit the head, but then I have the advantage of being able to see things in shades of gray. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | I wouldn't credit the head either.
As to your what you should do, maybe this will help...if it were a credit of, "John Smith and Joe Smith as Crazy Grady Zombie," would you use the credited as or enter two individual credits? If your answer is the former, use credited as. If you answer is the latter, then 'Jon Killough as Crazy Grady Zombie'. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 1,982 |
| Posted: | | | | I wouldn't credit it also. |
|
Registered: August 23, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,656 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting mdnitoil: Quote: Personally I wouldn't credit the head, but then I have the advantage of being able to see things in shades of gray. Yeah, I wouldn't credit the head, either. | | | Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com
"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 20,111 |
| Posted: | | | | Thanks for the input. I really wouldn't even enter it either and was leaning towards that, except it's already added in the existing profile. I'll contribute the head's removal and see what happens... | | | Corey |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,730 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote: For "joke" credits like this I tend to use the "credited as" to show what's screen
So in this case I would put Jon//Killough [Jon Killough and a Neat Fake Head] as "Crazy Grady Zombie" But aren't this in fact two "actors" sharing the same role?? So the correct entry would probably be Group divider named: "Crazy Grady Zombie" Jon Killough A Neat Fake Head // End Group divider Just kidding of course: Don't enter it | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up! But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 | | | Last edited: by Lewis_Prothero |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,197 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote: For "joke" credits like this I tend to use the "credited as" to show what's screen
So in this case I would put Jon//Killough [Jon Killough and a Neat Fake Head] as "Crazy Grady Zombie" This. | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,730 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting KinoNiki: Quote: Quoting northbloke:
Quote: For "joke" credits like this I tend to use the "credited as" to show what's screen
So in this case I would put Jon//Killough [Jon Killough and a Neat Fake Head] as "Crazy Grady Zombie"
This. No! Because it would mess up the CLT results for Jon Killough and is an incorrect interpretation of the credits. The smaller "and" clearly indicates that we are talking about two "actors" here that share one role. So if we'd enter "A Neat Fake Head" at all, it would be below a group divider named "Crazy Grady Zombie" together with Jon Killough as the second member of this group. But as said before: Since this "Neat Fake Head" is directly comparable to "Special Trained Mountain Llamas", it shouldn't be entered at all. | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up! But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 | | | Last edited: by Lewis_Prothero |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,759 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting mdnitoil: Quote: Personally I wouldn't credit the head, but then I have the advantage of being able to see things in shades of gray. Agreed! Both on the head and the colour. |
|
Registered: January 1, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,087 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting KinoNiki: Quote: Quoting northbloke:
Quote: For "joke" credits like this I tend to use the "credited as" to show what's screen
So in this case I would put Jon//Killough [Jon Killough and a Neat Fake Head] as "Crazy Grady Zombie"
This. +1 (Like the Simpsons Halloween credits) Just would be problematic if it is the only/first credit of him in database. |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting VirusPil: Quote: Just would be problematic if it is the only/first credit of him in database. It's not, I checked before I posted. And I still think it's the best way of dealing with these odd credits. Personally I think removing these quirky little additions makes the profile a little dry, whereas including them mimics the humour found within the film itself. In terms of contributing to the online I would have no objections either for or against adding the credit, but now that it's on the profile I don't see the harm in just leaving it. It's not bad data. |
|