Author |
Message |
Registered: May 30, 2008 | Posts: 445 |
| Posted: | | | | I remember reading some threads complaining about the lack of a feature for Profiler that would allow it to track multiple copies (loan history / status) of the same title.
The basic answer I saw was: This is a video rental store feature that is irrelevant for a home user, and you would expect to pay thousands of dollars for this sort of thing.
People recommended entering the 2nd (nth) copy by way of DiscID, etc.
Well I have three copies of "Kinky Boots" (786936294668), and have had all three loaned out at once, and was trying figure out a neater solution.
Since Profiler knows about EAN/GTIN-13 as well as standard UPC-A, I asked myself:
What if you dropped the UPC-A check digit, added another unique digit, computed a check digit for the longer code, and then used THAT as the title identifier?
It starts off with adding the title per usual, and then changing the UPC-A number to the one you want. Just for safety I locked the entire title.
So now it looks like this:
UPC-A 786936294668
Less check digit: 78693629466
Then the three copies:
7869362946608 7869362946615 7869362946622
And I appear to have three copies, each of which can have its own loan status or history, notes, etc.
Of course you lose the auto-updating feature, but for many stable titles this might not be a big deal.
So what's wrong with this picture? |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting lasitter: Quote: So what's wrong with this picture? Too complicated. Just enter the letter "m" as the new UPC. --------------- | | | Last edited: by scotthm |
|
Registered: May 30, 2008 | Posts: 445 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: So what's wrong with this picture? Too complicated. Just enter the letter "m" as the new UPC. --------------- Certainly "M" is less complicated, but: I'm entering valid UPC/ check digits as far as Profiler is concerned, so it doesn't complain. Since I'm using all the significant bits of the old UPC number, I don't have to keep track of A,B,C ... This system gives you up to 10 copies (0-9) per original UPC, so you don't have to worry about re-using your "M". They all sort together by UPC. And it's not that complicated, since there are any number of free UPC check digit calculators on the web. But it is certainly more complicated than "M". |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting lasitter: Quote: This system gives you up to 10 copies (0-9) per original UPC, so you don't have to worry about re-using your "M". When you enter "m" as a UPC the program automatically assigns a unique number. There is no "re-using" of anything, but sorting by UPC would be a problem. Sorting by title still works though. --------------- | | | Last edited: by scotthm |
|
Registered: May 30, 2008 | Posts: 445 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: When you enter "m" as a UPC the program automatically assigns a unique number. There is no "re-using" of anything, but sorting by UPC would be a problem. Sorting by title still works though.
--------------- Assigns a unique UPC number? A unique DiscID? Or just the collection number?
Where would you go to see this unique number? |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | It is a unique manual profile number... and it shows in the same place as the upc. Here is a shot of one I did... I use them all the time. Not only for a situation like you said... but to break up box sets where more then one movie is on a single side of a disc. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: May 30, 2008 | Posts: 445 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote: I use them all the time. Not only for a situation like you said... but to break up box sets where more then one movie is on a single side of a disc. Thanks for the look. Of course, if you have two movies on one side of a disc, or two movies with one on opposite sides of the disc, it's hard to loan out one without loaning out the other ... |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | Why not make all three copies difernant Localitys ( don't submit of of course),, you now have three seperate titles of the same Title .. you can now loan out all three at the same time .. problem solved .. | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry |
|
Registered: May 30, 2008 | Posts: 445 |
| Posted: | | | | Going back to my example for Kinky Boots:
786936294668 7869362946608 7869362946615 7869362946622 7869362946639 7869362946646 7869362946653 7869362946660 7869362946677 7869362946684 7869362946691
You actually get the original UPC plus 10 extra copies.
The advantage of keeping the original UPC is that at least THAT copy gets updates.
The advantage of using these generated but valid UPC codes might be that it offers a way of transferring info between co-conspirators even when the bigger database does not for certain situations.
Right now we're forced into using DiscIDs for listing extra titles when a studio reuses UPC codes for re-releases that are actually different.
I've often wondered: What does a DiscID actually tell you?
Perhaps discs that are identical in every way can have different DiscIDs just because they were pressed in different plants.
I don't think it guarantees you that two different discs (different DiscIDs) have different content.
Sometimes you're just getting an identical transfer from a different releasing company that has added it's own logo splash before the opening credits.
The different ways that studios can re-use a UPC is seemingly endless, even beyond the usual anamorphic vs letterbox vs P&S vs ...
We can't use manual IDs to transfer info entered by one user to another, or via localities, or any number of other methods easily.
A UPC/GTIN trick might be a semi-elegant way around this.
The usual method for converting UPC to GTIN is to pre-pend one or more zeros. What I've done is simply clip the original check digit and replace it with 0-9, and then calculate the new check digit.
What I don't know is the probability that the fake UPCs would ever end up being used in real life ... |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,337 |
| Posted: | | | | This makes absolutely no sense, non what so ever. |
|
Registered: October 6, 2008 | Posts: 1,932 |
| Posted: | | | | I can see no advantage to this over manual profiles. |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting lasitter: Quote: What I don't know is the probability that the fake UPCs would ever end up being used in real life ... What I don't know is why you're trying to make something that's so simple so complicated. What difference does it make whether the UPC in your local database "looks" legitimate or not? Just use the real UPC for one copy and use program generated "manual UPCs" for the attitional copies. It's very simple. Of course, since this seems to be such a big issue for you, you may be better off with software written specifically for the video rental business. --------------- |
|
Registered: March 31, 2007 | Posts: 662 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting lasitter: Quote: Perhaps discs that are identical in every way can have different DiscIDs just because they were pressed in different plants.
I don't think it guarantees you that two different discs (different DiscIDs) have different content. There's no chance two different DiscIDs can bring up the same disc. But there's a small chance that two different discs can result in the same DiscID. Quoting lasitter: Quote: Sometimes you're just getting an identical transfer from a different releasing company that has added it's own logo splash before the opening credits. Adding or changing some stuff will get you a different disc. And by the way: how would I know which of your fake-upc's I had to use for my release. | | | |
|
Registered: May 30, 2008 | Posts: 445 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Kulju: Quote: This makes absolutely no sense, non what so ever. I've offered a lot of clues as to how it might make sense. Your response offers me nothing in return. |
|
Registered: May 30, 2008 | Posts: 445 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting CalebAndCo: Quote: I can see no advantage to this over manual profiles. Having the UPCs sort together is one advantage. Being able to exchange information based on a transportable (with some effort) number is another. |
|
Registered: May 30, 2008 | Posts: 445 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: What difference does it make whether the UPC in your local database "looks" legitimate or not? I like seeing standard width columns, which you don't get with something like DiscIDs that are much larger than UPC codes Quoting scotthm: Quote: Just use the real UPC for one copy and use program generated "manual UPCs" for the attitional (sic) copies. It's very simple.
Of course, since this seems to be such a big issue for you, you may be better off with software written specifically for the video rental business. --------------- One of the nice things about Profiler is that all of us get to use it however we want locally. This is another way of using it locally to suit my preferences / needs. I know you didn't think of it first, but why should you be so threatened by it? I don't mind if you use the "manual" profile trick. It doesn't threaten me in the least. Why should I go out looking for an expensive rental store program when I've already arrived at a solution? I'm not about to "just go away". I'm not going to suggest that you should either. That's just rude. | | | Last edited: by lasitter |
|