X-Men: First Class lists many make-up effects/make-up artists. I figure it's a given that we should include people actually credited as Make up Supervisors or Make up Artists, but what about "Make up crew" or long lists of names that come after company credits? Also, as different Make up artists worked on different characters would it be okay to include group headers like "Mystique Make up Artists" to contextualize their work? Should these "Make up artists" be listed in the profile as make-up effects?


(Note: For the above image, I Photoshopped together successive screenshots to make it easier to read.)

Looking at the different profiles, each seems to do it different ways. For example, one profile included only Alec Gillis, Tom Woodruff, and the names listed in the "Mystique Make Up Artists" group. Another profile lists everyone from Alec Gillis through the names in the "Beast Make Up" group, but excludes everyone who worked on Mystique.

I agree with ateo on everything except his last sentence.  That wording has alway been odd because of the way the program works.  The way we enter crew credits, under predefined roles, we have no choice but to group them together within each role available.  As long as we enter them in the exact order listed, company headers included, then we have followed the rule...my opinion, of course.

As for using group headers for the specific crew role name, I have never done that.  I always use the 'Custom Role' field for that.

Thanks! Your opinions are in line with what I was thinking. Any thoughts about the Mystique and Azazel "Make-up Artists"? Should they be entered as make-up artists or make-up effects? The nature of the make-up seems to be more make up effects, but they're credited as make-up artists.

Mystique
Azazel

Agree. Should be no conflicts that way.