I have a few of these releases: Amadeus, GoodFellas and The Shining. I've entered them all with Best of Warner Bros. into the edition field. The only one that applies to a version like this is Amadeus which is also the Director's Cut.

I entered that one into the system as Amadeus: Director's Cut: Best of Warner Bros.

I entered it that way because Director's Cut applies directly to the film (so I did it first) while Best of Warner Bros. only references the release of blu-rays (so I have it listed second).

Two editions for one film have always left me scratching my head, but that was my reasoning for doing that one the way I did.

I usually go with what Pete does, unless it is a series of releases like this one is.  In a case like this, I prioritize series first then title specific, so I would go...

Best of Warmer Bros.: 70th Anniversary Edition

First and foremost we are profiling the DVD/BR release. I always seen the feature on the disc as secondary to the disc we were profiling.

I already gave my opinion on the subject... on situations like this... I always go from top to bottom... what is listed first (at the top) on the cover gets listed first in profile. That is how I do it every time. No matter what it actually says. So depending on the design of the cover it could very well be different from one release to another.

Quoting Kathy:

Quote:
Quoting CubbyUps:

Quote:
I would go with 70th Anniversary Edition: Best of Warner Bros..

Since we are profiling the movie on the disc, I think the first edition should match the movie. Best of Warner Bros. is linked to the studio (more or less) and has really nothing to do with the movie. Other than being the disc distributor.

I debated on what I would do and think this seems the most logical to me.

Agreed as I said in my first post. This way just makes the most sense to me. And that's not to say that Addicted's way of doing it would be incorrect, since this isn't really specified anywhere, we're kind of left on our own. Top down could get confusing in some cases, whereas putting the edition that relates directly to the film first seems more like a clear cut way, again, to me.

The only way to get true consistency (at least in the online database) is for Ken to make a decision on how to do it when there is more then 1 edition.

I seriously don't see you getting everyone to agree with one way here on the forum... plus there is many people that do not come to the forums who do contribute.