Author |
Message |
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | From the newly updated rules: Quote: For English titles, capitalize all words except "a", "an", "and", "as", "at", "but", "by", "for", "in", "it", "nor", "of", "on", "or", "the", "to", "up", and "with". Exception: Capitalize any word that is the first, last, or only word in the title. Since "up" is part of that list, it can no longer be capitalized. Fine. But how does this affect titles like " The Change-Up"? Do we still capitalize the "U" there, or does this new rule means that we should change it to "The Change-up"? | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,479 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: ...r does this new rule means that we should change it to "The Change-up"? The rule is cristal clear. Why this question? As you wrote many times, the result has no importance, we just apply rules without thinking. | | | Images from movies |
| Registered: March 23, 2011 | Posts: 462 |
| Posted: | | | | Just wonder.
Why is "up" in the list, but not "down"? Why "with", but not "without"? | | | Last edited: by No-way |
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,479 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Flåklypa: Quote: Why is "up" in the list, but not "down"? Why "with", but not "without"? Rules are everything except logic... | | | Images from movies |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: From the newly updated rules:
Quote: For English titles, capitalize all words except "a", "an", "and", "as", "at", "but", "by", "for", "in", "it", "nor", "of", "on", "or", "the", "to", "up", and "with". Exception: Capitalize any word that is the first, last, or only word in the title. Since "up" is part of that list, it can no longer be capitalized. Why would you make such an assumption? Quoting Flåklypa: Quote: Just wonder.
Why is "up" in the list, but not "down"? Why "with", but not "without"? If you would join the Rules Committee you could read the discussion that arrived at this conclusion. --------------- | | | Last edited: by scotthm |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting T!M:
Quote: Since "up" is part of that list, it can no longer be capitalized. Why would you make such an assumption? Ah, so you feel that "Up" in "The Change-up" can be capitalized because it's the last word? That means assuming "Change-Up" is two words - does everyone agree on that? In that case, am I correct in assuming that you would use the capital "U" in "The Change- Up", but a lowercase "u" in, say, 'The Pick- up Artist"? Despite surfeur51's apparent conviction, I have no real preference here. I just want to know how to handle this consistently. The poll results as of yet indicate that this particular rule isn't fleshed out enough. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: Quoting scotthm:
Quote: Quoting T!M:
Quote: Since "up" is part of that list, it can no longer be capitalized. Why would you make such an assumption? Ah, so you feel that "Up" in "The Change-up" can be capitalized because it's the last word? I'm asking why you believe "up" can no longer be capitalized just because it's on that list even though there are exceptions listed. The only question seems to be whether "change-up" is one or two words. If it's one word it's "Change-up". If two then "Change-Up". I don't believe hyphenated compound words were part of the discussion that resulted in this rules change. --------------- |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 554 |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,774 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Rizor: Quote:
Easier said than done! Normally it is easy, just sent a PM to Ken or use the support ticket system. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | I don't believe that list applies because it is not a stand-alone "up".
Hyphenated words are not addressed in the Rules, so I would leave it exactly the way it is. | | | Hal |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,272 |
| Posted: | | | | Dont like the new rule
now seeing some submissions to update vs. to Vs | | | HDTV: 52" Toshiba Regza 52XV545U AVR: Onkyo TR-707 Speakers: Paradigm Monitor 7 v6, CC-190 & Atom Monitors Subwoofer: Definitive Technology ProSub 800 BD/DVD: Oppo BDP-93 (Region Free) HD PVR: Motorola DXC3400 500GB w/ 1TB Expander BD/DVD/Game: 250GB PS3 Slim DVD/Game: 250GB XBox 360 Elite Special Edition (Black) Game: Wii Remote: Logitech Harmony One w/ PS3 Adapter WHS: Acer H341 Windows Home Server |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DoubleDownAgain: Quote: Dont like the new rule
now seeing some submissions to update vs. to Vs The new rule is fine, but leaving out the period is wrong. --------------- |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | The style guide for English titles says not to capitalize any preposition which is less than five characters. We've got submissions going in for changing "from" to "From" which is totally wrong!
The rule should have said not to capitalize articles, coordinating conjunctions and prepositions less than 5 characters. Using a list is a mistake because some will always be overlooked.
Articles: a, an, the
Coordinating conjunctions: for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so
Prepositions: amid, as, at, atop, by, chez, down, for, from, in, into, near, of, off, on, onto, out, over, past, sans, to, unto, up, upon, via, with | | | Hal | | | Last edited: by hal9g |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,272 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting DoubleDownAgain:
Quote: Dont like the new rule
now seeing some submissions to update vs. to Vs The new rule is fine, but leaving out the period is wrong.
--------------- That was on me... But I disagree, it should never be Vs. unless that is what the title actually is. | | | HDTV: 52" Toshiba Regza 52XV545U AVR: Onkyo TR-707 Speakers: Paradigm Monitor 7 v6, CC-190 & Atom Monitors Subwoofer: Definitive Technology ProSub 800 BD/DVD: Oppo BDP-93 (Region Free) HD PVR: Motorola DXC3400 500GB w/ 1TB Expander BD/DVD/Game: 250GB PS3 Slim DVD/Game: 250GB XBox 360 Elite Special Edition (Black) Game: Wii Remote: Logitech Harmony One w/ PS3 Adapter WHS: Acer H341 Windows Home Server |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,272 |
| Posted: | | | | I also think a rule should be that the title is taken as on the cover, unless all letters are uppercase or lowercase. Take this for example: Someone just made a contribution yesterday under the new rules to change it from Stranger than Fiction to Stranger Than Fiction | | | HDTV: 52" Toshiba Regza 52XV545U AVR: Onkyo TR-707 Speakers: Paradigm Monitor 7 v6, CC-190 & Atom Monitors Subwoofer: Definitive Technology ProSub 800 BD/DVD: Oppo BDP-93 (Region Free) HD PVR: Motorola DXC3400 500GB w/ 1TB Expander BD/DVD/Game: 250GB PS3 Slim DVD/Game: 250GB XBox 360 Elite Special Edition (Black) Game: Wii Remote: Logitech Harmony One w/ PS3 Adapter WHS: Acer H341 Windows Home Server |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DoubleDownAgain: Quote: it should never be Vs. unless that is what the title actually is. Maybe someday Ken will allow us to lock our local title data. --------------- |
|
|