| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 4,245 |
| | Posted: | | | | Does the name of a studio get included in the edition field if it's in the middle of an edition? Such as the following. Does Universal get included in the following? Edition=Universal Classic Television  Or the Warner Brothers Archive Collection? Edition=Warner Bros. Archive Collection  Yes or no? | | | | Last edited: by CubbyUps |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 5,715 |
| | Posted: | | | | IF Classic Television qualifies as an edition, then the full name (Universal Classic Television) should be used, to differentiate from other similar series... | | | | Complete list of Common Names • A good point for starting with Headshots (and v11.1) |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 1,631 |
| | Posted: | | | |  Absolutely not. I think this has gone too far when it comes to titles and editions. Simply put does WB or Universal call them the Warner Bros. Archive Collection or Universal Classic Television? The answer is NO. |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,715 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting rdodolak: Quote:
Absolutely not. I think this has gone too far when it comes to titles and editions. Simply put does WB or Universal call them the Warner Bros. Archive Collection or Universal Classic Television? The answer is NO. I don't think, that this justifies an edition at all (that's why I bolded the IF), but that was not the question... An edition named simply Classic Television seems very useless to me... BTW: cool smiley  | | | | Complete list of Common Names • A good point for starting with Headshots (and v11.1) |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 553 |
| |
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | | Posts: 823 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting rdodolak: Quote:
Absolutely not. I think this has gone too far when it comes to titles and editions. Simply put does WB or Universal call them the Warner Bros. Archive Collection or Universal Classic Television? The answer is NO. According to you maybe. To me the answer is YES. It freaking says so right on the cover. | | | | 99.9% of all cat plans consist only of "Step 1." |
|
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,850 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting AiAustria: Quote:
IF Classic Television qualifies as an edition, then the full name (Universal Classic Television) should be used, to differentiate from other similar series... It would be "Classic Universal Television" if you insist that the Universal logo be included. The answer is "no". --------------- | | | | Last edited: by scotthm |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,631 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Grendell: Quote:
According to you maybe. To me the answer is YES. It freaking says so right on the cover. Not according to the studios. | | | | Last edited: by rdodolak |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,201 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting rdodolak: Quote:
Absolutely not. I think this has gone too far when it comes to titles and editions. Simply put does WB or Universal call them the Warner Bros. Archive Collection or Universal Classic Television? The answer is NO. I can't find any reference to 'Universal Classic Television', but WB does indeed call them 'Warner Archive Collection' so the answer is actually YES for one of them | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar | | | | Last edited: by TheMadMartian |
|